I see in the demonstration that each of those bottom-of-pavement points follow the surface instead of connecting the points between them. That is at least a little bit counterintuitive.
I don't know whether this behavior was established for the effect demonstrated in the video, or if it's simply a side effect of other software design decisions, but the fact that the constraints that were set *per point* were applied *to the component, between the points* is disheartening. Logic is being applied inconsistently, right? But I guess it's working as designed.
I don't know whether this behavior was established for the effect demonstrated in the video, or if it's simply a side effect of other software design decisions, but the fact that the constraints that were set *per point* were applied *to the component, between the points* is disheartening. Logic is being applied inconsistently, right? But I guess it's working as designed.