Well, I downloaded your dgnlib and had a look.
Because it took me a while to find the feature definitions, for others I'll say that the feature definitions are found under Feature Definitions/Linear/Modeling. (It wasn't entirely obvious, and I hadn't seen anywhere else in the thread that would have told me.)
Selecting all three of the features you mentioned, and cycling through them in the Element Information window, I see that the templates used for plan, profile, 3D, and projected profile are all appropriate for its specific feature definition. Other than this, the only difference that I see in all the feature definitions is only that the EOP feature creates template geometry. Since the EOS feature is properly labeled, this can't be the problem. All of them use the same template for cross sections: Modeling\Points\XS_Label Point Indicator as you noted.
I see that the templates for each of the features in plan, profile, 3D, and projected profile are all identical except the level, and they have only general settings. They're all primary elements. The cross section template has 'x' for active points, so that's good.
However, I see that the Classes setting on your template XS_Label Point Indicator has both construction and primary. I don't know whether that matters. Have you confirmed that your CL points are construction or primary? That may matter.
I see nothing else that could possibly have any impact.
Because it took me a while to find the feature definitions, for others I'll say that the feature definitions are found under Feature Definitions/Linear/Modeling. (It wasn't entirely obvious, and I hadn't seen anywhere else in the thread that would have told me.)
Selecting all three of the features you mentioned, and cycling through them in the Element Information window, I see that the templates used for plan, profile, 3D, and projected profile are all appropriate for its specific feature definition. Other than this, the only difference that I see in all the feature definitions is only that the EOP feature creates template geometry. Since the EOS feature is properly labeled, this can't be the problem. All of them use the same template for cross sections: Modeling\Points\XS_Label Point Indicator as you noted.
I see that the templates for each of the features in plan, profile, 3D, and projected profile are all identical except the level, and they have only general settings. They're all primary elements. The cross section template has 'x' for active points, so that's good.
However, I see that the Classes setting on your template XS_Label Point Indicator has both construction and primary. I don't know whether that matters. Have you confirmed that your CL points are construction or primary? That may matter.
I see nothing else that could possibly have any impact.