Ok, I should add a few things:
1. Do you understand now why for cut and fills we have Area insteed of Volume?
2. It is also worth to mention that you have 3 different tools to calculate volumes:
a) Element component quantities (Analysis & Reporting) it works fine with add clipping referance function, but it is not recomended with Display Rules
b) Component quantities (Corridor Modeling) it works fine with display rules, but doesn't take into account add clipping referance function
c) Standard Cross-Section Method. I still prefer this method, becouse we can easly verify our outcomes. In ECQ and CQ you never know, if your outcome is 100% correct.
3. I've tested it for you, and I don't know how we can get rid of square feet (how to delete them from report). I thought that Volume option in Feature definition can be responsible for it... but I was wrong.
JP
1. Do you understand now why for cut and fills we have Area insteed of Volume?
2. It is also worth to mention that you have 3 different tools to calculate volumes:
a) Element component quantities (Analysis & Reporting) it works fine with add clipping referance function, but it is not recomended with Display Rules
b) Component quantities (Corridor Modeling) it works fine with display rules, but doesn't take into account add clipping referance function
c) Standard Cross-Section Method. I still prefer this method, becouse we can easly verify our outcomes. In ECQ and CQ you never know, if your outcome is 100% correct.
3. I've tested it for you, and I don't know how we can get rid of square feet (how to delete them from report). I thought that Volume option in Feature definition can be responsible for it... but I was wrong.
JP